PUTRAJAYA, Oct 19 — The Court of Appeal has ordered the High Court to rehear an application by 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB) and four of its subsidiaries to set aside a judgment in default (JID) entered against fugitive businessman Low Taek Jho and his father Tan Sri Larry Low Hock Peng.
A three-judge panel comprising Justices Datuk Azhahari Kamal Ramli, Datuk Ahmad Kamal Md Shahid, and Alice Loke Yee Ching allowed 1MDB and its subsidiaries' appeal against a High Court decision that dismissed their application.
Justice Azhahari ordered the case to be remitted to the High Court for a full hearing before a different judge.
He fixed Monday (October 26) for case management at the High Court.
Last year, the Kuala Lumpur High Court dismissed the companies’ application to set aside the JID, citing a delay of nearly three years in filing it.
In 2022, 1MDB obtained a JID against Low, also known as Jho Low, and Hock Peng, ordering them to pay US$3,782,637,525 (RM15.43 billion) together with annual interest of five per cent on the respective sums from dates between 2010 and 2014 until full settlement.
The High Court entered judgment against father and son after rejecting their defence for failing to comply with a Mareva injunction.
Last year, 1MDB applied to set aside the JID against the two men, seeking to proceed to a full trial and pursue additional relief against them.
The companies claimed that, when the JID was entered, they were unaware of evidence that later emerged in foreign proceedings. They also said the alleged fraud perpetrated by the defendants was sophisticated and involved multiple entities across various jurisdictions.
A judgment in default is given to a plaintiff when the defendant fails to respond to a summons or appear in court.
1MDB and its four subsidiaries: 1MDB Energy Holdings Ltd, 1MDB Energy Ltd, Global Diversified Investment Co Ltd (formerly known as 1MDB Global Investments Ltd), and 1MDB Energy (Langat) Ltd , filed the US$3.78 billion suit in May 2021 against Jho Low, his father, his mother Puan Sri Goh Gaik Ewe, his siblings Taek Szen and May Lin, and his associate Tan Kim Loong.
The suit involved allegations of fraudulent concealment, fraudulent misappropriation of funds and unjust enrichment, among other claims.
At today’s proceedings, lawyer Lee Shih, assisted by Priyadiana Annadurai, submitted that the companies had been denied a fair hearing because they could not present arguments on the merits of their application to set aside the JID.
Low and his father were neither present nor represented by lawyers in court today.
