KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 20 — The High Court has proposed that the civil suit filed by noted high-performance transformation coach Syed Mohammad Murad Syed Naseem, better known as Murad "Baddestcoach" Zaidi, against social media influencer Caprice, be resolved through mediation.
Caprice’s counsel Megat Syazlee Mokhtarom confirmed that the suggestion was made by Judge Kan Weng Hin during an in-chambers case management on Monday (November 17).
“The judge proposed that both parties attempt mediation. However, the plaintiff (Murad) did not agree. The court has fixed December 9 for the next case management,” he said.
Murad's counsel Datuk M. Reza Hassan also confirmed the matter.
On November 8, the High Court recorded a consent order compelling Caprice, whose real name is Ariz Ramli, to immediately take down and withdraw nine defamatory statements published on his Instagram account against Murad.
The order was recorded after he agreed to comply and also undertook not to republish, redistribute, or disseminate any of the alleged statements in any form.
According to a draft consent order, Caprice also agreed not to make any further remarks or representations of a similar nature against Murad, who is widely recognised for redefining elite fitness and corporate performance culture in Malaysia through his flagship brand Badcave Training Facility.
Following the undertaking, Murad withdrew his interim injunction application against Caprice, with no order as to costs. However, the main defamation suit is proceeding.
On August 4, Murad filed the suit, claiming that Caprice had uploaded false and malicious content portraying him as being involved in criminal activities and organised crime, and as a result of the publications, the plaintiff claimed that his reputation and dignity were damaged, noting that the defendant commands significant influence on Instagram with more than 1.5 million followers.
He is seeking an injunction to restrain the defendant and his agents from publishing or repeating defamatory posts about him, as well as a video apology on all of the defendant’s social media platforms, along with damages, costs, and any other relief deemed appropriate by the court.
Meanwhile, in his statement of defence, Caprice maintained that his remarks were made without malice.
