KUALA LUMPUR, Nov 10 — The prosecution has requested that the application by Toh Puan Na’imah Abdul Khalid to refer eight legal questions to the Federal Court, regarding a charge of failing to declare assets, be heard by another High Court judge.
Deputy Public Prosecutor Mohd Fadhly Mohd Zamry informed Sessions Court Judge Azura Alwi that the request was made during the mention of the application before High Court Deputy Registrar Nur Liyana Mohd Sulaiman earlier today.
“Our application for the legal questions to be heard by another High Court judge is intended to expedite the hearing process,” he said.
Fadhly added that the Deputy Registrar had informed them that there is currently no replacement for the High Court (Criminal 2) judge following Judge K. Muniandy’s appointment to the Court of Appeal.
The court has fixed November 21 for the next mention to update the status of whether the hearing to refer the legal questions will remain under High Court (Criminal 2) or be transferred to another High Court.
In line with this, he requested that the mention for Na’imah’s asset declaration case at the Sessions Court also be set on the same date, which Judge Azura later granted.
On August 21, Judge Muniandy had allowed Na’imah’s application after ruling that the legal questions raised were not frivolous or an abuse of court process, overturning an earlier Sessions Court decision.
Na'imah applied to refer legal questions relating to Sections 30(5), 36(2) and 62 of the MACC Act 2009, as well as Section 32(3)(b) of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing, and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001 on February 29 last year.
On February 18 this year, Judge Azura dismissed the application for lack of merit, as no constitutional issues were raised in the case.
Na’imah, widow of the late former finance minister Tun Daim Zainuddin, was charged in the Sessions Court on January 23 last year with failing to comply with a notice to declare her assets, which included Menara Ilham and several properties in Kuala Lumpur and Penang.
She was charged under Section 36(2) of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Act 2009, which provides a maximum sentence of five years imprisonment or a fine of RM100,000 if convicted.
